Digital Storytelling and Open, Networked Social Scholarship: A Narrative

John F. Barber

doi:10.5334/kula.37

Authors

John F. Barber Washington State University Vancouver

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.37

Keywords:

Network, social network, open social scholarship, collaboration, digital media, interdisciplinary, multimodal, usability

Abstract

This essay responds to a challenge of the INKE 2018 gathering: To highlight activities that focus on the engagement and implementation of networked open social scholarship. One response to this challenge is to distribute scholarly communication as storytelling through multiple digital media channels. The author participated in an international, multidisciplinary fellowship focused on how to implement such an undertaking. This narrative describes the collaborative efforts, presentations, and practices that emerged from this open, social scholarship endeavor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Matthew Hiebert, and Ray Siemens, working with Shaun Wong, Derek Siemens, Alex Christie, Jon Saklofske, and Jentery Sayers. 2014. Scholarly and Research Communication, 5(2): 1–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n2a150

Bounegru, Liliana. 2008. “Secondary Orality in Microblogging.” Masters of Media (blog), October 13. http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2008/10/13/secondary-orality-in-microblogging/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/CZ97-73FG.

Burke, Peter. 2012. A Social History of Knowledge II: From the Encyclopédie to Wikipedia. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dubber, Andrew. 2013. Radio in The Digital Age. Cambridge, UK. Polity Books.

Dziekan, Vince. 2012. Virtuality and the Art of Exhibition: Curatorial Design for the Multimedial Museum. Bristol, UK: Intellect.

Eagleton, Terry. 2010. “The Rise of English.” In: Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, V. B. Leitch (ed.), 2140–2146. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

Engeström, Jyri. 2005. “Why Some Social Network Services Work and Others Don’t—Or: The Case for Object-Centered Sociality.” Zengestrom (blog), April 13. http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why-some-social-network-services-work-and-others-dont-or-the-case-for-object-centered-sociality.html. Archived at: https://perma.cc/P9EC-5JPP.

Engeström, Yrjö. 2000. “Activity Theory as a Framework for Analyzing and Redesigning Work.” Ergonomics, 43(7): 960–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409143

Fjällbrant, Nancy. 1997. “Scholarly Communication—Historical Development and New Possibilities.” In: Proceedings of the IATUL Conference. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Library.

Gitelman, Lisa. 2006. Always Already New: Media, History, and the Data of Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jagodzinski, Cecile M. 2008. “The University Press in North America: A Brief History.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40(1): 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.40.1.1

Johns, Adrian. 2011. Death of a Pirate: British Radio and the Making of the Information Age. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.

MacLeod, Hugh. 2007. “More Thoughts on Social Objects.” Gapingvoid. http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/004265.html. Archived at: https://perma.cc/3GLQ-VY4T.

McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London, UK: Methuen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064

Scholarly Communications Institute. 2017. “Scholarly Storytelling: Compelling Research for an Engaged Public.” https://trianglesci.org/2017-institute/scholarly-storytelling/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/Z3VC-4A42.

Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. New York, NY: Penguin.

Stewart, Bonnie, and Alyssa Arbuckle. 2017. “How Can We Make Scholarship More Relevant?” Inside Higher Ed (blog), November 13. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/how-can-we-make-scholarship-more-relevant. Archived at: https://perma.cc/PYX4-UJ9K.

Streeter, Thomas. 2010. “Introduction.” In: The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet, 1–17. New York, NY: New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814741153.003.0001

Surowiecki, James. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Weinberger, David. 2007. Everything Is Miscellaneous: The Power of the New Digital Disorder. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.