Open+: Versioning Open Social Scholarship


  • Alyssa Arbuckle University of Victoria



open scholarship, open access, community engagement, public humanities, digital scholarship


Advocates of the Open Access (OA) movement have been fighting for free and unfettered access to research output since the early 1990s. Open access is a crucial element of a fair, efficient scholarly communication system where all are able to find, interpret, and use the results of publicly-funded research. Universal open access is more possible now than ever before, thanks to networked technologies and the development of open scholarship policies. But what happens after access to research is provided? In this paper I argue that versioning scholarship across varying modes and formats would move scholarly communication from a straightforward open access system to a more engaging environment for multiple communities.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Alyssa Arbuckle, University of Victoria

Alyssa Arbuckle is the Associate Director of the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL) at the University of Victoria, where she works with the Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) research group and the Digital Humanities Summer Institute (DHSI). Arbuckle is also an interdisciplinary PhD student at the University of Victoria, studying open social scholarship and its implementation (planned completion 2019). She holds a BA Honours in English from the University of British Columbia and an MA in English from the University of Victoria, and her previous studies have centred around digital humanities, new media, and contemporary American literature. Her work has appeared in Digital Studies, Digital Humanities Quarterly, and Scholarly and Research Communication, among other venues.


Ahmed, Allam. 2007. “Open Access Towards Bridging the Digital Divide – Policies and Strategies for Developing Countries.” Information Technology for Development, 13(4): 337–61. DOI:

Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Bonnie Stewart. 2017. “How Can We Make Scholarship More Relevant?” Inside Higher Ed (blog), November 13. Accessed May 11, 2018. Archived at:

Arbuckle, Alyssa, and John Maxwell. Forthcoming. “Modelling Networked Open Social Scholarship within the INKE Community.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies, 2(2): n.p.

Brennan, Sheila A. 2016. “Public, First.” In: Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, Gold, Matthew K., and Klein, Lauren F. (Eds.), 384–89. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Eve, Martin Paul. 2014. Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies, and the Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2011. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: New York University Press.

Gargouri, Yassine, Chawki Hajjem, Vincente Larivière, Yves Gringas, Les Carr, Tim Brody, and Stevan Harnad. 2010. “Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research.” PLoS ONE, 5(10): n.p. DOI:

Government of Canada. 2015. Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications. Ottawa: n.p. Archived at:

Harnad, Stevan. 2011. “Open Access is a Research Community Matter, Not a Publishing Community Matter.” Lifelong Learning in Europe, 16(2): 117–18.

Hsu, Wendy F. 2016. “Lessons on Public Humanities from the Civic Sphere.” In: Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, Gold, Matthew K., and Klein, Lauren F. (Eds.), 280–86. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

International Telecommunication Union. 2017. “ITU Releases 2015 ICT Figures.”

Jhangiani, Rajiv S. 2017. “Open as Default: The Future of Education and Scholarship.” In: Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science, Jhangiani, Rajiv S., and Robert Biswas-Diener (eds.), 267–79. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI:

Lovett, Julia A., Andrée J. Rathemacher, Diana Boukari, and Corey Lang. 2017. “Institutional Repositories and Academic Social Networks: Competition or Complement? A Study of Open Access Policy Compliance vs. ResearchGate Participation.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5(1): n.p. DOI:

Mandell, Laura. 2015. Breaking the Book: Print Humanities in the Digital Age. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI:

Maxwell, John. 2015. “Beyond Open Access to Open Publication and Open Scholarship.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(3): 1–10. DOI:

McGregor, Heidi, and Kevin Guthrie. 2015. “Delivering Impact of Scholarly Information: Is Access Enough?” Journal of Electronic Publishing, 18(3): n.p. DOI:

Rodriguez, Allyson. 2017. “Collaboration in Scholarly Communication: Opportunities to Normalize Open Access.” College & Research Libraries News, 78(5): 270. DOI:

Suber, Peter. 2010. “Thoughts on Prestige, Quality, and Open Access.” Logos, 21(1): 115–28. DOI:

Suber, Peter. 2012. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press.




How to Cite

Arbuckle, Alyssa. 2019. “Open+: Versioning Open Social Scholarship”. KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (1):18.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)