Foundations for On-Campus Open Social Scholarship Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.14Keywords:
social knowledge creation, open social scholarship, citizen scholar, scholarly communication, WikipediaAbstract
Social knowledge creation, citizen scholarship, interdisciplinary collaborations, and university-community partnerships have become more common and more visible in contemporary academia. The Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL) currently focuses on how to engage with such transformations in knowledge creation. In this paper we survey the intellectual foundation of social knowledge creation and major initiatives undertaken to pursue and enact this research in the ETCL. “Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies” (Arbuckle, Belojevic, Hiebert, Siemens, et al. 2014), and an updated iteration, “An Annotated Bibliography on Social Knowledge Creation,” (Arbuckle, El Hajj, El Khatib, Seatter, Siemens, et al, 2017), explore how academics collaborate to create knowledge, and how social knowledge creation can bridge the real or perceived gap between the academy and the public. This knowledgebase lays the foundation for the “Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography” (El Hajj, El Khatib, Leibel, Seatter, et al. 2019), which draws on research that adopts and propagates social knowledge creation ideals and explores trends such as accessible research development and dissemination. Using these annotated bibliographies as a theoretical foundation for action, the ETCL began test-driving open social scholarship initiatives with the launch of the Open Knowledge Practicum (OKP). The OKP invites members of the community and the university to pursue their own research in the ETCL. Research output is published in open, public venues. Overall, we aim to acknowledge the expanding, social nature of knowledge production, and to detail how the ETCL utilizes in-person interaction and the digital medium to facilitate open social scholarship.Downloads
Metrics
References
Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the INKE, ETCL, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(3): n.p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n3a200
Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Matthew Hiebert, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Shaun Wong, Derek Siemens, Alex Christie, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, and the INKE & ETCL Research Groups. 2014. “Social Knowledge Creation: Three Annotated Bibliographies.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 5(2): n.p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n2a150
Arbuckle, Alyssa, Nina Belojevic, Tracey El Hajj, Randa El Khatib, Lindsey Seatter, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Alex Christie, Matthew Hiebert, Jon Saklofske, Jentery Sayers, Derek Siemens, Shaun Wong, and the INKE and ETCL Research Groups. 2017. “An Annotated Bibliography of Social Knowledge Creation.” In: Social Knowledge Creation in the Humanities: Volume I, Alyssa Arbuckle, Aaron Mauro, and Daniel Powell (Eds.), 29–264. Arizona: Iter Academic Press and Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
Crompton, Constance, Daniel Powell, Alyssa Arbuckle, and Raymond G. Siemens, with Maggie Shirley and the Devonshire Manuscript Editorial Group. 2015. “Building a Social Edition of the Devonshire Manuscript.” Renaissance and Reformation, 37(4): 131–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43446354.
El Khatib, Randa, Lindsey Seatter, Tracey El-Hajj, and Conrad Leibel, with Alyssa Arbuckle, Ray Siemens, Caroline Winter, and the ETCL Research Group. 2019. “Open Social Scholarship Annotated Bibliography.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies.
Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2011. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: New York University Press.
Gaertner, David. 2016. “A Landless Territory? Augmented Reality, Land, and Indigenous Storytelling in Cyberspace.” In: Learn, Teach, Challenge: Approaching Indigenous Literatures, Deanna Reder, and Linda M. Morra (eds.), 493–98. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
Nosek, Brian A. 2017. “Opening Science.” In: Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science, Rajiv S. Jhangiani, and Robert Biswas-Diener (eds.), 89–100. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc
Paterson, Jody. 2017. “Citizen Scientists are the Future of our Oceans.” University of Victoria, June 5. Accessed July 24, 2018. https://www.uvic.ca/news/topics/2017+citizen-scientists-onc+ring. Archived at: https://perma.cc/QV92-BBFM.
Siemens, Raymond G., Karin Armstrong, Constance Crompton, and the Devonshire Manuscript Editorial Group. (Eds.) 2012. A Social Edition of the Devonshire Manuscript. Wikibooks. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/The_Devonshire_Manuscript.
Siemens, Raymond G., Meagan Timney, Cara Leitch, Corina Koolen, and Alex Garnett, and the ETCL, INKE, & PKP Research Groups. 2012a. “Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media.” Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27(4): 445–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqs013.
Siemens, Raymond G., Meagan Timney, Cara Leitch, Corina Koolen, and Alex Garnett, and the ETCL, INKE, & PKP Research Groups. 2012b. “Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media: Selected, Annotated Bibliographies.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, 6(1): n.p.
Siemens, Raymond G., Mike Elkink, Alastair McColl, Karin Armstrong, James Dixon, Angelsea Saby, Brett D. Hirsch and Cara Leitch, with Martin Holmes, Eric Haswell, Chris Gaudet, Paul Girn, Michael Joyce, Rachel Gold, and Gerry Watson, and members of the PKP, Iter, TAPoR, and INKE Research Teams. 2010. “Underpinnings of the Social Edition? A Narrative, 2004–9, for the Renaissance English Knowledgebase (REKn) and Professional Reading Environment (PReE) Projects.” In: Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come, Jerome McGann, with Andrew Stauffer, Dana Wheeles, and Michael Pickard.(eds.). Houston, TX: Rice University Press.
Social Sciences Graduate Studies. 2017. “Scuba Divers Count Fish for Science.” University of Victoria, July 13. Accessed July 24, 2018. https://www.uvic.ca/news/topics/2017+scuba-divers-count-fish-for-science+media-release. Archived at: https://perma.cc/8ZXW-PGVE.
Willinsky, John. 2006. The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Randa El Khatib, Alyssa Arbuckle, Ray Siemens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.