Playful Lenses: Using Twine to Facilitate Open Social Scholarship through Game-based Inquiry, Research, and Scholarly Communication
Keywords:Twine, digital games, research, communication, open social scholarship, digital humanities
AbstractIn academic contexts, digital games are often studied as texts or are used as pedagogical tools to teach basic concepts in early education situations. Less usefully, their systems and economies are often co-opted and decontextualized in short-sighted attempts to “gamify” various aspects of learning or training. However, given that games are highly controlled, conditional, choice-and-consequence-based, problem-solving environments in which players are expected to interact with simulated settings and elements after agreeing to take on particular roles and subject positions, there are promising potential uses of these experiences in academic contexts that have not been fully considered. Motivated by the imperative to explore alternative modes and methods of scholarly research and communication, and guided by the values of open social scholarship practices, this paper reconsiders games not as things to study, but as instruments to study with. Given that games can function as simulations, models, arguments and creative collaboratories, game-based inquiry can be used as a potential method of post-secondary and post-graduate humanities research and scholarly communication. While these ideas have been explored in a preliminary way in relation to a number of different academic disciplines (Donchin 1995; Boot 2015; Mitgutsch and Weise 2011; Westecott 2011) this paper is meant to catalyse a humanities-calibrated consideration of the pragmatics and potentials of game-based research, games as instances of critical making and scholarly communication, and more complex forms of game-based learning than those currently practiced. A number of examples that make use of the open source Twine platform will be featured.
Bogost, Ian. 2007. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bogost, Ian. 2012. “Gamification is Bullshit.” Bogost.com. Accessed June 2018. http://www.bogost.com/blog/gamification_is_bullshit.shtml. Archived at: https://perma.cc/5GNH-X9EE.
Boot, Walter R. 2015. “Video Games as Tools to Achieve Insight into Cognitive Processes.” Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 1–3. January. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00003
Brice, Mattie. 2014. “Queer as in Fuck Me—A Design Manifesto.” Alternate Ending Blog. Accessed June 2018. http://www.mattiebrice.com/queer-as-in-fuck-me-a-design-manifesto/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/HPL4-YQ2X.
Case, Nicky. 2016. We Become What We Behold. Accessed June 2018. https://ncase.itch.io/wbwwb.
da Silva Martire, Alex. 2014. “DOMUS: Cyber-Archeology in Three-Dimensional Virtual Environment.” Proceedings of the 2014 Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications (ISDEA ’14), 148–155. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
Donchin, Emanuel. 1995. “Video Games as Research Tools: The Space Fortress Game.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, Computers, 27(2): 127–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204735
Foucault, Michael. 1984. “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias.” Translated by Jay Miskowiec. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité, 1–9. October.
Frasca, Gonzalo. 2003. September 12. Newsgaming. Accessed June 2018. http://www.newsgaming.com/games/index12.html.
Klimas, Chris, et al. 2016. Twine 2.1.3. Accessed June 2018. https://twinery.org/.
Kopas, Merrit. (ed.) 2015. Videogames for Humans. New York: Instar.
Levitas, Ruth. 2013. Utopia as Method. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314253
Linietsky, Juan, and Ariel Manzur. 2016. Godot Game Engine 2.1.1. November 2016. Accessed June 2018. https://godotengine.org/.
Mitgutsch, K., and M. Weise. 2011. “Subversive Game Design for Recursive Learning.” DIGRA 2011 Proceedings: Think Design Play.
Porpentine. 2012. “Howling Dogs.” Accessed June 2018. http://slimedaughter.com/games/twine/howlingdogs/.
Quinn, Zoe. 2013. “Depression Quest.” Accessed June 2018. http://www.depressionquest.com/dqfinal.html.
Salen, Katie, and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Unity Technologies. 2016. Unity Game Engine 5.5.0. Accessed June 2018. http://unity3d.com/.
Westecott, Emma. 2011. “Games as Research Tools.” Vimeo.com, uploaded by Toronto Digifest. Accessed December 2016. https://vimeo.com/33724936.
Wilson, Rebecca. 2016. Brauron. Accessed June 2018. http://socrates.acadiau.ca/courses/engl/jsaklofske/wilson/Brauron.html.
Wilson, Rebecca. 2016. Infinite. Accessed June 2018. http://socrates.acadiau.ca/courses/engl/jsaklofske/INFINITE.html.
Wilson, Rebecca. 2016. Ritual Recreation of ‘The Spell of Pnouthis.’ Accessed June 2018. http://socrates.acadiau.ca/courses/engl/jsaklofske/wilson/Ritual.html.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2019 Rebecca Wilson, Jon Saklofske, The INKE Research team
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.