The Typewriter Under the Bed: Introducing Digital Humanities through Banned Books and Endangered Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.30Keywords:
banned books, censorship, digital humanities, digital pedagogy, introduction to digital humanities, undergraduate learning, rare booksAbstract
In 2017, I taught an Introduction to Digital Humanities course for undergraduate students at the University of Toronto. The course’s unifying theme was banned books. What moved me to focus the course in this way was the illegal typewriter that lived under my childhood bed: I grew up in formerly communist Eastern Europe, where typewriters were tightly controlled by the government. Yet my family owned an illegal, unregistered typewriter, hidden under my bed behind the off-season clothes, because they saw the ability to write and disseminate one’s thoughts as a technology of survival.
In the Intro to DH course, students explored the intellectual landscape of the digital humanities by thinking about banned books throughout history. They examined early printed books of astronomy; early printed books of the lives of saints; illicitly typewritten and photographed Soviet samizdat; endangered climate change research data rescued by the Internet Archive; and American Library Association data about banned and challenged books for children and young adults. This article reflects on using the lens of banned books and endangered knowledge to focus an Introduction to DH course and encourage students to interrogate critically how a variety of technologies—from codex to printing press to typewriter to the internet—create, transmit, preserve, and repress knowledge and cultural memory.
Downloads
Metrics
References
American Library Association. 2013. “Top Ten Most Challenged Books Lists.” Accessed May 30, 2018. http://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbooks/top10. Archived at: https://perma.cc/T4R5-6ETD.
Amodio, Mark C. 2004. Writing the Oral Tradition: Oral Poetics and Literate Culture in Medieval England. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Bolter, Jay David, and Richard A. Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burrington, Ingrid. 2015. “The Strange Geopolitics of the International Cloud.” Atlantic, November 17, 2015. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/11/the-strange-geopolitics-of-the-international-cloud/416370/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/E5SR-HFPK Accessed May 30, 2018.
Câmpeanu, Pavel. 1981. “Studies on the Mass Communication Public in Romania.” Cahiers d’études de radio-télévision, 30: 153–58.
Carefoote, Pearce J. 2005. Nihil Obstat: An Exhibition of Banned, Censored and Challenged Books in the West, 1491–2000: Exhibition and Catalogue. Toronto: Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library.
Carefoote, Pearce J. 2007. Forbidden Fruit: Banned, Censored, and Challenged Books from Dante to Harry Potter. Toronto: Lester, Mason & Begg.
Carefoote, Pearce J. 2017. “Flickering of the Flame: The Book and the Reformation.” Exhibition. September 25, 2017 to December 25, 2017. Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library. https://fisher.library.utoronto.ca/exhibition/3811.
Cavell, Megan. 2015. “Riddle 47.” The Riddle Ages, November 23, 2015. Accessed February 21, 2018. https://theriddleages.wordpress.com/2015/11/23/commentary-for-riddle-47/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/TN95-UZCE.
CBS/APA. 2017. “‘Thirteen Reasons Why’ Briefly Pulled By Colorado School District.” CBS News, May 16, 2017. Accessed May 30, 2018. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/thirteen-reasons-why-colorado-school-district/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/7PQX-6HA3.
Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1999. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology [Éloge de la variante. Histoire critique de la philologie]. Translated by Betsy Wing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cohen, Daniel J., and Roy Rosenzweig. 2006. “The Fragility of Digital Materials.” Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Preserving, and Presenting the Past on the Web. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/index.php Accessed May 30, 2018.
Cordell, Ryan. 2014. “Technologies of Text.” Syllabus. http://f14tot.ryancordell.org/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/92R6-K4WM.
Cordell, Ryan. 2016. “How Not to Teach Digital Humanities.” In: Debates in the Digital Humanities, Matthew K. Gold, and Lauren F. Klein (eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/87. Archived at: https://perma.cc/NRZ6-8CB5.
Croxall, Brian. 2017. “Screwing Up DH101: My Talk at MLA 2017.” http://www.briancroxall.net/2017/01/23/screwing-up-dh101-talk-at-mla-2017/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/LX4U-QY2M. Syllabus: http://www.briancroxall.net/s14dh/s14dh.pdf.
De Sá Pereira, Moacir P. 2017a. “Digital Literary Studies: Novel Maps of New York.” Syllabus. Accessed May 30, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17613/M6D56V
De Sá Pereira, Moacir P. 2017b. “Media History of New York.” Syllabus. Accessed May 30, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17613/M6HV72
Drucker, Johanna. 2011. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html. Archived at: https://perma.cc/F8MK-DVEL.
Drucker, Johanna, with David Kim. 2013. “Intro to Digital Humanities: Concepts, Methods, and Tutorials for Students and Instructors.” DH101. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://dh101.humanities.ucla.edu. Archived at: https://perma.cc/P9PY-LLCE.
Duarte, Marisa Elena, and Miranda Belarde-Lewis. 2015. “Imagining: Creating Spaces for Indigenous Ontologies.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(5–6): 677–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1018396
Foley, John Miles. 1991. Immanent Art: From Structure to Meaning in Traditional Oral Epic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Foley, John Miles. 2003. “How Genres Leak in Traditional Verse.” Unlocking the Wordhord: Anglo-Saxon Studies in Memory of Edward B. Irving, Jr., Mark C. Amodio, and Katherine O’Brien O’Keeffe (eds.), 76–108. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442682931-007
Foys, Martin. 2018. “The Undoing of Exeter Book Riddle 47: ‘Bookmoth.’” Transitional States: Cultural Change, Tradition and Memory in Medieval England, Graham Caie, and Michael D. C. Drout (eds.). Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS).
Gogâță, Christina. 2016. “Parallel Libraries of the Former Securitate. Ana Blandiana, ‘Întâmplări de pe strada mea.’” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai – Philologia, 61(2): 97–100.
Goldstone, Andrew. 2014. “Literary Data: Some Approaches.” Syllabus. Accessed May 30, 2018. http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~ag978/litdata/syllabus/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/MR9S-2UPL.
Goma, Paul. 1983. “The Rumanian [sic] Labyrinth.” Censorship and Political Communication in Eastern Europe: A Collection of Documents, George Schöpflin (ed.), 165–68. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Graham, Bradley. 1983. “Climate of Intimidation Is Evident in Romania.” Washington Post, November 24, 1983. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1983/11/24/climate-of-intimidation-is-evident-in-romania/360b20f4-2dfd-4c00-9317-76548c1f0319/?utm_term=.16013ccf9a68 Accessed May 30, 2018. Archived at: https://perma.cc/U6QT-XRBC.
Graham, Shawn. 2017. “Introduction to Digital Humanities.” Syllabus. Accessed May 30, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17613/M6D50K
Green, Jonathon. 1990. “Rumania [sic].” The Encyclopedia of Censorship, 260–61. New York, NY: Facts on File.
Jacobs, Nicholas. 1998. “The Old English ‘Book-moth’ Riddle Reconsidered.” Notes and Queries, 35(3): 290–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nq/35-3-290b
Komaromi, Ann. 2015. Project for the Study of Dissidence and Samizdat. https://samizdatcollections.library.utoronto.ca.
Komaromi, Ann. 2017. “Samizdat.” WDW235: Introduction to Digital Humanities. Class lecture at the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, September 28, 2017.
Krapp, George Philip, and Elliott Van Kirk Dobbie. 1936. The Exeter Book. New York: Columbia University Press.
Liu, Alan. 2007. “Imagining the New Media Encounter.” In: A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Ray Siemens, and Susan Schreiber (eds.), 3–25. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Liu, Alan. 2014. “English 197: Close Reading and Distant Reading in Literary Studies.” Syllabus. http://english197w2014.pbworks.com/w/page/71971382/FrontPage Accessed May 30, 2018.
Liu, Alan. 2017. “Hacking Literary Interpretation.” Syllabus. http://english197s2015.pbworks.com/w/page/93127947/FrontPage Accessed May 30, 2018.
Mapes, Kristen. 2017. “Teaching Introduction to Digital Humanities Courses Beyond the Canon.” Presented at Innovations in Digital Humanities Pedagogy: Local, National, and International Training. University of McGill, Montreal, August 8, 2017. https://www.kristenmapes.com/dhpedagogyconf2017/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/C3WV-FN47.
McClurken, Jeffrey. 2011. “Teaching and Learning with Omeka: Discomfort, Play, and Creating Public, Online, Digital Collections.” In: Learning Through Digital Media Experiments in Technology and Pedagogy, R. Trebor Scholz (ed.), 137–49. New York: The Institute for Distributed Creativity.
McGann, Jerome J. 2001. Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. New York: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10738-1
National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation. n.d. “About the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation.” Accessed May 30, 2018. http://nctr.ca/about-new.php.
Nowviskie, Bethany. 2014. “Neatline & Visualization as Interpretation.” Bethany Nowviskie (blog), November 2, 2014. http://nowviskie.org/2014/neatline-and-visualization-as-interpretation/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/T9B6-NNYN Accessed May 30, 2018.
Nowviskie, Bethany. 2015. “Digital Humanities in the Anthropocene.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30(suppl_1): i4–i15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv015
Nowviskie, Bethany. 2016. “Everywhere, Everywhen.” Presented at Insuetude. Columbia University, April 28, 2016. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://nowviskie.org/2016/everywhere-every-when/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/GT93-73KH.
Nowviskie, Bethany. 2017. “5 Spectra for Speculative Knowledge Design.” Bethany Nowviskie (blog), April 22, 2017. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://nowviskie.org/2017/5-spectra/#more-3024. Archived at: https://perma.cc/K7EY-CW58.
O’Brien O’Keeffe, Katherine. 1994. “Editing and the Material Text.” The Editing of Old English: Papers from the 1990 Manchester Conference, D. G. Scragg, and Paul E. Szarmach (eds.), 147–54. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Posner, Miriam. 2015a. “Humanities Data: A Necessary Contradiction.” Presented at the Harvard Purdue Data Management Symposium. Cambridge, MA, June 17, 2015. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://miriamposner.com/blog/humanities-data-a-necessary-contradiction/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/L5DF-6QV7.
Posner, Miriam. 2015b. “Introduction to Digital Humanities.” Syllabus. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://miriamposner.com/dh101f15.
Posner, Miriam. 2017. “Annotated Bibliography Guidelines.” Introduction to Digital Humanities. Syllabus. Accessed May 20, 2018. http://miriamposner.com/classes/dh101f17/assignments/final-project/milestones/annotated-bibliography-guidelines/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/9PCN-YV4B.
Renoir, Alain. 1988. A Key to Old Poems: The Oral-Formulaic Approach to the Interpretation of West-Germanic Verse. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schlitz, Stephanie A., and Garrick S. Bodine. 2012. “The Martha Berry Digital Archive Project: A Case Study in Experimental pEDagogy.” Code4Lib, 17(June 1): n.p. http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/6823. Archived at: https://perma.cc/YG5A-5FKD.
Selisker, Scott. 2016. “Digital Humanities Knowledge: Reflections on the Introductory Graduate Syllabus.” In: Debates in the Digital Humanities, Matthew K. Gold, and Lauren F. Klein (eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.
Spiro, Lisa. 2010. “Digital Humanities Education.” Zotero Group Library. Registered September 11, 2010; accessed May 30, 2018. https://www.zotero.org/groups/25016/digital_humanities_education.
Swafford, Joanna. 2016. “Read, Play, Build: Teaching Sherlock Holmes through Digital Humanities.” In: Digital Humanities 2016: Conference Abstracts, 371–72. Jagiellonian University & Pedagogical University: Kraków. http://dh2016.adho.org/abstracts/431. Archived at: https://perma.cc/PF86-4SWM. Syllabus: https://hawksites.newpaltz.edu/dhm293/.
Tansey, Eira. 2017. “When the Unbearable Becomes Inevitable: Archives and Climate Change.” Presented at Fierce Urgencies: The Social Responsibility of Collecting and Protecting Data. Beinecke Speaker Series at Yale University, New Haven, CT, May 16, 2017. http://eiratansey.com/2017/05/16/fierce-urgencies-2017/. Archived at: https://perma.cc/4D5J-7R5N.
Trettien, Whitney. 2017. “How We Read (Freshman Year Seminar syllabus).” Syllabus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17613/M6CW3N
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. 2015. The Survivors Speak: A Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Accessed February 21, 2018. http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Findings/Survivors_Speak_2015_05_30_web_o.pdf.
University of Toronto Libraries. 2018. “Research Data Management” (policies and best practices). https://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/researchdata/ Accessed May 30, 2018.
University of Toronto Libraries. 2018. “University of Toronto Libraries Undergraduate Research Prize.” https://onesearch.library.utoronto.ca/undergrad-research-prize/criteria/ Accessed May 30, 2018. Archived at: https://perma.cc/8SQ3-VGZ8.
Zumthor, Paul. 1972. Essai de poétique médiévale, Collection Poétique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Alexandra Bolintineanu, Jaya Thirugnanasampanthan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
