Joining Voices: University – Industry Partnerships in the Humanities

Authors

  • Lynne Siemens University of Victoria
  • The INKE Research Group University of Victoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.42

Keywords:

collaboration, university-industry partnerships, INKE, NOSS

Abstract

University-industry partnerships are common in the Sciences, but less so in the Humanities. As a result, there is little understanding of how they work in the Humanities. Using the Implementing New Knowledge Environments: Networked Open Social Scholarship (INKE:NOSS) initiative as a case study, this paper contributes to this discussion by examining the nature of the university-industry partnership with libraries and academic-adjacent organizations, and associated benefits, challenges, measures of success, and outcomes. Interviews were conducted with the collaboration’s industry partners. After several years of collaboration on the development of a grant application, industry partners have found the experience of working with academics to be a positive one overall. Industry partners are contributing primarily in-kind resources in the form of staff time, travel to meetings, and reading and commenting on documents. They have also been able to realize benefits while negotiating the challenges. Using qualitative standards, measures of success and desired outcomes are being articulated. This work developing the partnership should stand the larger INKE:NOSS team in good stead if they are successful with securing grant funding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ankrah, Samuel, and Omar Al-Tabbaa. 2015. “Universities–Industry Collaboration: A Systematic Review.” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3): 387–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

Barnes, Tina, Ian Pashby, and Anne Gibbons. 2002. “Effective University – Industry Interaction.” European Management Journal, 20(3): 272–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0

Cassity, Elizabeth, and Ien Ang. 2006. “Humanities–Industry Partnerships and the ‘Knowledge Society’: The Australian Experience.” Minerva, 44(1): 47–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-005-5412-9

Garrett-Jones, Sam, Tim Turpin, Peter Burns, and Kieren Diment. 2005. “Common Purpose and Divided Loyalties: The Risks and Rewards of Cross-Sector Collaboration for Academic and Government Researchers.” R&D Management, 35(5): 535–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00410.x

INKE. 2014a. “Future Directions.” Accessed November 3, 2014. http://inke.ca/projects/future-directions/.

INKE. 2014b. “Whistler Gathering 2014.” Accessed January 9, 2015. http://inke.ca/projects/whistler-gathering-2014/.

Lee, Yong S. 2000. “The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment.” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2): 111–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895322042

Marshall, Catherine, and Gretchen B. Rossman. 1999. Designing Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

McCracken, Grant. 1988. The Long Interview. Qualitative Research Methods, 13. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications.

Newell, Sue, and Jacky Swan. 2000. “Trust and Inter-Organizational Networking.” Human Relations, 53(10): 1287–1328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/a014106

Olmos-Peñuela, Julia, Elena Castro-Martínez, and Pablo D’Este. 2014. “Knowledge Transfer Activities in Social Sciences and Humanities: Explaining the Interactions of Research Groups with Non-Academic Agents.” Research Policy, 43(4): 696–706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004

Phillips, Laura. 2009. “Success Factors Powering University – Industry Collaboration in Australia.” http://www.wohlin.eu/Phillips_Report.pdf.

Pitman, Tim, and Judith E. Berman. 2009. “Of What Benefit and to Whom? Linking Australian Humanities Research with Its ‘End Users’.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(4): 315–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800903191955

Plewa, C., and P. Quester. 2007. “Key Drivers of University-Industry Relationships: The Role of Organisational Compatibility and Personal Experience.” Journal of Services Marketing, 21(5): 370–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710773679

Plewa, Carolin, Nisha Korff, Claire Johnson, Gregory Macpherson, Thomas Baaken, and Giselle Camille Rampersad. 2013. “The Evolution of University–Industry Linkages—a Framework.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(1): 21–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.11.005

Ramos-Vielba, Irene, Mabel Sánchez-Barrioluengo, and Richard Woolley. 2016. “Scientific Research Groups’ Cooperation with Firms and Government Agencies: Motivations and Barriers.” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3): 558–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9429-4

Rubin, Herbert J., and Irene S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2012a. “Firing on All Cylinders: Progress and Transition in INKE’s Year 2.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 3(4): 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2012v3n4a72

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2012b. “From Writing the Grant to Working the Grant: An Exploration of Processes and Procedures in Transition.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 3(1): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2012v3n1a49

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2012c. “Understanding Long-Term Collaboration: Reflections on Year 1 and Before.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 3(1): 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2012v3n1a48

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2013. “Responding to Change and Transition in INKE’s Year Three.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 4(3): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2013v4n3a115

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2014a. “Building and Sustaining Long-Term Collaboration – Lessons at the Midway Mark.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 5(2): 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n2a153

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2014b. “Research Collaboration as ‘Layers of Engagement’: INKE in Year Four.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 5(4): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n4a181

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2015. “‘Inke-Cubating’ Research Networks, Projects, and Partnerships: Reflections on INKE’s Fifth Year.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(4): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n4a198

Siemens, Lynne, and INKE Research Group. 2016. “Faster Alone, Further Together: Reflections on INKE’s Year Six.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 7(2): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a250

Siemens, Raymond G., Claire Warwick, Richard Cunningham, Teresa Dobson, Alan Galey, Stan Ruecker, Susan Schreibman, and INKE Research Group. 2009. “Codex Ultor: Toward a Conceptual and Theoretical Foundation for New Research on Books and Knowledge Environments.” Digital Studies/Le champ numerique, 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.270

Sofoulis, A. 2011. “Cross-Connections: Linking Urban Water Managers with Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Researchers.” Retrieved from: http://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:11648.

SSHRC. 2015. “Partnership Grants: An Overview.” Accessed November 28, 2017. http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/partnership_development_grants-subventions_partenariat_developpement-eng.aspx.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-27

How to Cite

Siemens, Lynne, and The INKE Research Group. 2019. “Joining Voices: University – Industry Partnerships in the Humanities”. KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (1):15. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.42.

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.