Modelling Linked Data for Conservation

A Call for New Standards

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.232

Keywords:

conservation, data modelling, data standards, linked data, metadata, preservation, tool creation

Abstract

Conservation documentation serves an invaluable role in the history of cultural property, and conservators are bound by professional ethics to maintain accurate, clear, and permanent documentation about their work. Though many well-documented schemata exist for describing the holdings of memory organizations, none are designed to capture conservation documentation data in a semantically meaningful way. Conservation data often includes deeply detailed observations about the physical structure, materiality, and condition state of an object and how these characteristics change over time. When included with descriptive catalog metadata, these conservation data points typically manifest in seldom-used fields as free-text notes written with inconsistently applied standards and uncontrolled vocabularies. Beyond the traditional scope of descriptive metadata, conservation treatment documentation includes event-oriented data that captures a sequence of steps taken by the conservator, the addition and removal of material, and cause-and-effect relationships between observed conditions and treatment decisions made by a conservator. In 2020, the Linked Conservation Data Consortium conducted a pilot project to transform unstructured conservation data into linked data. Participants examined potential models in the library field and ultimately chose to conform to the Comité International pour la Documentation (CIDOC) Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) for its accommodation of event-oriented data and detailed descriptive attribution. Project technologists worked with real report data from four institutions to create XML data models and map newly structured data to the CRM. The pilot group then imported CRM-modelled datasets into a discovery environment, developed queries to reconcile the divergent datasets, and created knowledge maps and charts in response to a small set of predetermined research questions. Feedback from conservators attending workshop activities revealed a shared need for conservation data standards and guidelines for those developing documentation templates and databases. Project outcomes signalled the necessity of further developing conservation vocabularies and ontologies to link datasets between institutions and from adjacent domains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ryan Lieu, Stanford Libraries

Preservation Department, Conservation Operations Manager and Technologist, Stanford Libraries

Alberto Campagnolo, University of Udine

Adjunct Professor, University of Udine; Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies, Research Associate & Advisory Council Member, University of Pennsylvania; UCLDH & UCL Department of Information Studies Honorary Research Associate, London, UK; Editor in-Chief: The Journal of Paper Conservation (1868-0860);
Editorial Board Member: Manuscript Studies (2381-5329)

References

Aleppo, Mario. 2003. “160 Years of Conservation Documentation at The National Archives, UK.” The Paper Conservator 27 (1): 97–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03094227.2003.9638635.

American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 1994. Code of Ethics and Guidelines for Practice. Washington, DC: AIC. https://www.culturalheritage.org/docs/default-source/administration/governance/code-of-ethics-and-guidelines-for-practice.pdf. Archived at: https://perma.cc/9YFT-N6B4.

Campagnolo, Alberto. 2015. “Transforming Structured Descriptions to Visual Representations. An Automated Visualization of Historical Bookbinding Structures.” PhD diss., University of the Arts London. http://ualresearchonline.arts.ac.uk/8749/.

Campagnolo, Alberto. 2020. “Conservation and Digitization: A Difficult Balance?” In Book Conservation and Digitization: The Challenges of Dialogue and Collaboration, edited by Alberto Campagnolo, 49–82. Collection Development, Cultural Heritage, and Digital Humanities. Leeds: Arc Humanities Press.

Canadian Association for Conservation of Cultural Property (CAC) and of the Canadian Association of Professional Conservators (CAPC). 2000. Code of Ethics and Guidance for Practice. 3rd ed. Ottawa: CAC and CAPC. https://www.cac-accr.ca/download/code-of-ethics/.

France, Fenella G. 2016. “Spectral Imaging: Capturing and Retrieving Information You Didn’t Know Your Library Collections Contained.” In What Do We Lose When We Lose a Library?, edited by Lieve Watteeuw and Mel Collier, 189–97. Leuven: KU Leuven University Library. https://www.goethe.de/resources/files/pdf94/streamgate.pdf.

France, Fenella G. 2020. “Spectral Imaging to Aid Preservation and Conservation of Cultural Heritage.” In Book Conservation and Digitization: The Challenges of Dialogue and Collaboration, edited by Alberto Campagnolo, 169–78. Collection Development, Cultural Heritage, and Digital Humanities. Leeds: Arc Humanities Press.

Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas Institute of Computer Science (FORTH). 2019. X3ML Toolkit. Heraklion, Crete, GR: FORTH ICS. https://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/x3ml-toolkit.

International Council of Museums – Committee for Conservation (ICOM-CC). 2017. “Documentation Working Group. Triennial Programme 2017-2020.” https://web.archive.org/web/20210417015245/ https://www.icom-cc.org/73/Triennial%20programme/#.YHo_defP2Uc.

International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF). 2021. http://iiif.io.

The Institute of Conservation (ICON). 2020. “Conservation Reports.” https://www.icon.org.uk/resource/intro-to-conservation-reports.html.

Linked Conservation Data Network. 2020. “Linked Conservation Data.” http://web.archive.org/web/20201124092727/ https://www.ligatus.org.uk/lcd/.

Library of Congress. 2021. “BIBFRAME Model, Vocabulary, Guidelines, Examples, Notes, Analyses.” http://web.archive.org/web/20210424013138/ https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html.

Oldman, Dominic, and Diana Tanase. 2018. “Reshaping the Knowledge Graph by Connecting Researchers, Data and Practices in ResearchSpace.” In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2018: 17th International Semantic Web Conference, Monterrey, CA, USA, October 8–12, 2018, edited by Denny Vrandecˇic´ et al., 325–40. Cham: Springer.

PREMIS Editorial Committee. 2015. PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata, Version 3.0. Library of Congress. http://web.archive.org/web/20210415051612/https://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf.

Ravenberg, Heather. 2012. “A Data Model to Describe Book Conservation Treatment Activity.” MPhil thesis, University of the Arts London.

Scheper, Karin. 2018. The Technique of Islamic Bookbinding: Methods, Materials and Regional Varieties. 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/31508.

Velios, Athanasios. 2020. CRMVIZ. GitHub. https://github.com/natuk/crmviz.

Velios, Athanasios, and Nicholas Pickwoad. 2020. “The Development of the Language of Bindings Thesaurus.” In Book Conservation and Digitization: The Challenges of Dialogue and Collaboration, edited by Alberto Campagnolo, 157–68. Collection Development, Cultural Heritage, and Digital Humanities. Leeds: Arc Humanities Press.

Published

2022-07-27

How to Cite

Lieu, Ryan, and Alberto Campagnolo. 2022. “Modelling Linked Data for Conservation: A Call for New Standards”. KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 6 (3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.232.