Probabilistic Obliteration and Formulaic Fabrication
Citational (In)justice in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/kula.310Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, GenAI, large language models, ChatGPT, citational justice, hallucination, citation styles, APA, MLA, ChicagoAbstract
What does it mean to cite generative AI (GenAI) tools—both in an instrumental, information retrieval sense, and in a symbolic sense that has more to do with recognition? What does it mean that GenAI tools are also able to produce plausible-looking yet false citations? This theoretical article critically explores the possibility of citational justice in the GenAI era through an analysis of two sets of examples: (1) the existing citation guidance to GenAI output as articulated by the major style guides, and (2) the issue of “hallucinated” (or fabricated) citations produced by GenAI large language model (LLM) chatbots like ChatGPT. Using ideas from Robert K. Merton, Eugene Garfield, Emily M. Bender, Robert J. Connors, and Sam Popowich, I argue that GenAI, across both sets of examples, is antithetical to citational justice. In the first set of examples, I make the case that the human authors and their works, the real source of GenAI tools’ textual output, have been “obliterated”—a term that I borrow from Merton—as part of LLM training. This renders the official style guides’ recommendations for how to cite GenAI tools—particularly APA’s guidance—deeply inadequate. In the second set of examples, I see the fabricated citations produced by GenAI as antithetical to citational justice because they decentre the human. Crucially, though, these fabricated citations are actually perfectly suited to the irrelational context of contemporary higher education transformed by neoliberalism, where commodified student outputs are made to stand as evidence of students’ internal transformation. As a closing gesture, I contend that the issues brought to the fore by GenAI and citation could present a pedagogical opportunity to radically reconceive of library instruction, focusing it on the importance of attribution and relationality in academic work if we so chose, and I offer some questions to guide that reimagined pedagogy.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2013. “Making Feminist Points.” feministkilljoys (blog), September 11. https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/.
Albanese, Andrew. 2024. “Authors Sue AI Firm Anthropic for Copyright Infringement.” Publishers Weekly, August 20. https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/95768-authors-sue-ai-firm-anthropic-for-copyright-infringement.html.
Almeida, Nora. 2022. “Library Tautology: A Reenactment of the One-Shot.” College & Research Libraries 83 (5): 833–36. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.5.833.
Baer, Andrea. 2025a. “Investigating the ‘Feeling Rules’ of Generative AI and Imagining Alternative Futures.” In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2025/ai-feeling-rules/.
Baer, Andrea. 2025b. “Unpacking Predominant Narratives about Generative AI and Education: A Starting Point for Teaching Critical AI Literacy and Imagining Better Futures.” Library Trends 73 (3): 141–59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a961189.
Baker, Simon, and Takeo Kanade. 2000. “Hallucinating Faces.” In Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFGR.2000.840616.
Barrow, Nicholas. 2024. “Anthropomorphism and AI Hype.” AI and Ethics 4: 707–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00454-1.
Belanger, Ashley. 2023. “Sarah Silverman Sues OpenAI, Meta for Being ‘Industrial-Strength Plagiarists.’” Ars Technica, July 10. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/book-authors-sue-openai-and-meta-over-text-used-to-train-ai/.
Belanger, Ashley. 2025. “Authors Celebrate ‘Historic’ Settlement Coming Soon in Anthropic Class Action.” Ars Technica, August 26. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/authors-celebrate-historic-settlement-coming-soon-in-anthropic-class-action/.
Bender, Emily (@emilymbender@dair-community.social). 2022. “And let’s reflect for a moment on how they phrased their disclaimer, shall we? ‘Hallucinate’ is a terrible word choice.” Mastodon, November 16. https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender/109355539906866849.
Bender, Emily. 2023. “ChatGP-Why: When, if Ever, Is Synthetic Text Safe, Appropriate, and Desirable?” Virtual lecture, August 8. Posted August 12, 2023, by Global Research Alliance for AI in Learning and Education. YouTube, 59:16. https://youtu.be/qpE40jwMilU?si=2wiibpdmsSk-0OD3.
Bender, Emily. 2024a. “Information Literacy and Chatbots as Search.” Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000: The Newsletter, November 5. https://buttondown.com/maiht3k/archive/information-literacy-and-chatbots-as-search/.
Bender, Emily M. 2024b. “Resisting Dehumanization in the Age of ‘AI.’” Current Directions in Psychological Science 33 (2): 114–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231217286.
Bilder, Geoffrey. 2016. “DOI-like Strings and Fake DOIs.” Crossref Blog, June 29. https://doi.org/10.64000/8mj8h-2t809.
Blechinger, Joel. 2024a. “Insist on Sources: Wikipedia, LLMs, and the Limits of Information Literacy Instruction.” Paper presented at CAPAL24: Sustainability and Shared Futures in Academic Libraries Conference, virtual, June 7. https://doi.org/10.60770/36Y6-3562.
Blechinger, Joel. 2024b. Review of Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online, by M. Caulfield & S. Wineburg. Journal of Radical Librarianship 10: 8–11. https://journal.radicallibrarianship.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108.
Brodkin, Jon. 2023. “Lawyers Have Real Bad Day in Court After Citing Fake Cases Made Up by ChatGPT.” Ars Technica, June 23. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/06/lawyers-have-real-bad-day-in-court-after-citing-fake-cases-made-up-by-chatgpt/.
Butler, Patrick. 2025. “N.L.’s 10-Year Education Action Plan Cites Sources That Don’t Exist.” CBC News, September 12. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/education-accord-nl-sources-dont-exist-1.7631364.
Canzonetta, Jordan. 2018. “Can We Use Plagiarism Detection Services Responsibly?” In Student Plagiarism in Higher Education, edited by Diane Pecorari and Philip Shaw. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166148.
Canzonetta, Jordan. 2021. “Repurposing Plagiarism Detection Services for Responsible Pedagogical Application and (In)Formative Assessment of Source Attribution Practices.” Assessing Writing 50: Article 100563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100563.
Charlotin, Damien. n. d. “AI Hallucination Cases.” Damien Charlotin. https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/.
Chen, Jiawei, Hongyu Lin, Xianpei Han, and Le Sun. 2024. “Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 38 (16): 17754–62. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29728.
Chenevey, Liz. 2023. “Teaching the Politics of Citation: Challenging Students’ Perceptions.” College & Research Libraries News 84 (5): 152–57. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.5.152.
Coalter, Jodi H. 2023. “Citation Power: Overcoming Marginalization One Citation at a Time.” In Perspectives on Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Libraries, edited by Nandita S. Mani, Michaelle A. Cawley, and Emily P. Jones. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7255-2.ch004.
Connors, Robert J. 1998. “The Rhetoric of Citation Systems—Part I: The Development of Annotation Structures from the Renaissance to 1900*.” Rhetoric Review 17 (1): 6–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199809359230.
Connors, Robert J. 1999. “The Rhetoric of Citation Systems—Part II: Competing Epistemic Values in Citation.” Rhetoric Review 17 (2): 219–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350199909359242.
Craven, Christa. 2021. “Teaching Antiracist Citational Politics as a Project of Transformation: Lessons from the Cite Black Women Movement for White Feminist Anthropologists.” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 120–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12036.
Cronin, Blaise. 1984. The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. Taylor Graham. https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/cronin/citationprocess.pdf.
Day, Terence. 2023. “A Preliminary Investigation of Fake Peer-Reviewed Citations and References Generated by ChatGPT.” The Professional Geographer 75 (6): 1024–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373.
Decker, Stephanie. 2025. “Guest Post — The Open Access–AI Conundrum: Does Free to Read Mean Free to Train?” The Scholarly Kitchen, April 15. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/04/15/guest-post-the-open-access-ai-conundrum-does-free-to-read-mean-free-to-train/.
Dzieza, Josh. 2023. “AI Is a Lot of Work.” The Verge, June 20. https://www.theverge.com/features/23764584/ai-artificial-intelligence-data-notation-labor-scale-surge-remotasks-openai-chatbots.
Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2019. Generous Thinking: A Radical Approach to Saving the University. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fox, Violet B. 2024. A Librarian Against AI or I Think AI Should Leave. https://violetbfox.info/against-ai/.
Garfield, Eugene. 1965. “Can Citation Indexing be Automated?” In Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation: Symposium Proceedings, Washington 1964, edited by Mary Elizabeth Stevens, Vincent E. Giuliano, and Laurence B. Heilprin. National Bureau of Standards. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/MP/nbsmiscellaneouspub269.pdf.
Garfield, Eugene. 1975. “The ‘Obliteration Phenomenon’ in Science—and the Advantage of Being Obliterated!” Current Comments 51/52: 396–98. https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v2p396y1974-76.pdf.
Gewin, Virginia. 2021. “Pandemic Burnout Is Rampant in Academia.” Nature 591: 489–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00663-2.
Giray, Louie. 2024. “ChatGPT References Unveiled: Distinguishing the Reliable from the Fake.” Internet Reference Services Quarterly 28 (1): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2265369.
Goddiksen, Mads Paludan, Mikkel Willum Johansen, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Mateja Centa, Christine Clavien, Eugenijus Gefenas, Nóra Kovács, Marcus Tang Merit, I. Anna S. Olsson, Margarita Poškutė, Júlio Borlido Santos, Rita Santos, Vojko Strahovnik, Orsolya Varga, P. J. Wall, Peter Sandøe, and Thomas Bøker Lund. 2024. “The Dark Side of Text-Matching Software: Worries and Counterproductive Behaviour Among European Upper Secondary School and Bachelor Students.” International Journal of Educational Integrity 20: Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00162-7.
Golumbia, David. 2024. Cyberlibertarianism: The Right-Wing Politics of Digital Technology. University of Minnesota Press.
Haider, Jutta, and Olof Sundin. 2022. Paradoxes of Media and Information Literacy: The Crisis of Information. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163237.
Hasan, Ali. 2024. “Are You Anthropomorphizing AI?” Blog of the American Philosophical Association, August 20. https://blog.apaonline.org/2024/08/20/are-you-anthropomorphizing-ai-2/.
Hawley, Steven C. 2023. “OpenAI Trains Its GPT Model Using Pirated E-books, Contends Authors’ Lawsuit.” Piracy Monitor. June 30. https://piracymonitor.org/chat-gpt-trained-using-pirated-e-books/.
Herman, Daniel. 2022. “The End of High-School English.” The Atlantic, December 9. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/openai-chatgpt-writing-high-school-english-essay/672412/.
Hervieux, Sandy, and Amanda Wheatley. 2024. “Building an AI Literacy Framework: Perspectives from Instruction Librarians and Current Information Literacy Tools.” https://www.choice360.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/TaylorFrancis_whitepaper_08.28.24_final.pdf.
Hicks, Maggie. 2023. “No, ChatGPT Can’t Be Your New Research Assistant.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, August 23. https://www.chronicle.com/article/no-chatgpt-cant-be-your-new-research-assistant.
Hicks, Michael Townsen, James Humphries, and Joe Slater. 2024. “ChatGPT Is Bullshit.” Ethics and Information Technology 26: Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5.
Karaganis, Joe, ed. 2018. Shadow Libraries: Access to Knowledge in Global Higher Education. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11339.001.0001.
Karp, Paul. 2025. “AI-Tainted Deloitte Report Was Worse Than Previously Thought.” Financial Review, November 6. https://www.afr.com/politics/ai-tainted-deloitte-report-was-worse-than-previously-thought-20251106-p5n863.
Kennard, Emily, and Margaret Manto. 2025. “The MAHA Report Cites Studies That Don’t Exist.” NOTUS, May 29. http://notus.org/health-science/make-america-healthy-again-report-citation-errors.
Kirschenbaum, Matthew, and Rita Raley. 2024. “AI and the University as a Service.” PMLA 139 (3): 504–15. https://doi.org/10.1632/S003081292400052X.
Klein, Naomi. 2023. “AI Machines Aren’t ‘Hallucinating.’ But Their Makers Are.” The Guardian, May 8. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/08/ai-machines-hallucinating-naomi-klein.
Kneese, Tamara, and Meg Young. 2024. “Carbon Emissions in the Tailpipe of Generative AI.” Harvard Data Science Review (Special Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.fbdf6128.
Kwon, Diana. 2022. “The Rise of Citational Justice: How Scholars Are Making References Fairer.” Nature 603: 568–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00793-1.
LaFlamme, Katherine A. 2025. “Scaffolding AI Literacy: An Instructional Model for Academic Librarianship.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 51 (3): 103041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103041.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Lee, Christine. 2019. “How Much Do You Know About Turnitin’s Content?” Turnitin Blog, May 30. https://www.turnitin.com/blog/how-much-do-you-know-about-turnitins-content.
Lee, Matthew. n. d. “AI Hallucination Cases Tracker.” Natural and Artificial Intelligence in Law. https://naturalandartificiallaw.com/ai-hallucination-cases-tracker/.
Library Copyright Alliance. 2023. “Library Copyright Alliance Principles for Copyright and Artificial Intelligence.” Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, issued July 10. https://www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/AI-principles.pdf.
Littletree, Sandra, Nicola Andrews, and Jessie Loyer. 2023. “Information as a Relation: Defining Indigenous Information Literacy.” Journal of Information Literacy 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.11645/17.2.8.
Lo, Leo S. 2025a. “AI Literacy: A Guide for Academic Libraries.” College & Research Libraries News 86 (3): 120–22. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.86.3.120.
Lo, Leo S. 2025b. “AI Literacy for All: A Universal Framework.” Preprint, University of New Mexico Digital Repository. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ulls_fsp/213/.
Lotz, Avery. 2025. “AI Sycophancy: The Downside of a Digital Yes-Man.” Axios, July 7. https://www.axios.com/2025/07/07/ai-sycophancy-chatbots-mental-health.
Luccioni, Sasha, Bruna Trevelin, and Margaret Mitchell. 2024. “The Environmental Impacts of AI – Primer.” Hugging Face, September 3. https://huggingface.co/blog/sasha/ai-environment-primer.
Maleki, Negar, Balaji Padmanabhan, and Kaushik Dutta. 2024. “AI Hallucinations: A Misnomer Worth Clarifying.” Preprint, arXiv, January 9. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06796.
Martineau, Kim. 2023. “What Is Retrieval-Augmented Generation?” IBM Research, August 22. https://research.ibm.com/blog/retrieval-augmented-generation-RAG.
Marwala, Tshilidzi. 2024. “The Commercial Importance of Diversity in Generative AI.” Daily Maverick, August 21. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2024-08-21-the-commercial-importance-of-diversity-in-generative-ai/.
Mazel, Norah. 2025. “Generative AI and the Reinforcement of Information Privilege: Implications for Information Literacy Instruction.” Library Trends 73 (3): 323–43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a961197.
McAdoo, Timothy. 2024. “How to Cite ChatGPT.” APA Style Blog, February 23. Last updated September 15, 2025. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt.
McAdoo, Timothy, Samantha Denneny, and Chelsea Lee. 2025. “Citing Generative AI in APA Style: Part 1—Reference Formats.” APA Style Blog, September 9. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/cite-generative-ai-references.
McMurtrie, Beth. 2020. “The Pandemic Is Dragging On. Professors Are Burning Out.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 5. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-pandemic-is-dragging-on-professors-are-burning-out.
Menary, Richard. 2007. “Writing as Thinking.” Language Sciences 29 (5): 621–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005.
Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
Merton, Robert K. 1985. On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. Vicennial ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Merton, Robert K. 1988. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property.” Isis 79 (4): 606–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/354848.
Metz, Cade. 2023. “What Makes A.I. Chatbots Go Wrong?” The New York Times, April 4. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/29/technology/ai-chatbots-hallucinations.html.
Mills, Anna, and Nate Angell. 2025. “Are We Tripping? The Mirage of AI Hallucinations.” Preprint, SSRN, February 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5127162.
Modern Language Association. 2023. “How Do I Cite Generative AI in MLA Style?” MLA Style Center, March 17. https://style.mla.org/citing-generative-ai/.
Moore-Colyer, Roland. 2025. “AI Hallucinates More Frequently as It Gets More Advanced—Is There Any Way to Stop It from Happening, and Should We Even Try?” Live Science, June 21. https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/ai-hallucinates-more-frequently-as-it-gets-more-advanced-is-there-any-way-to-stop-it-from-happening-and-should-we-even-try.
Mott, Carrie, and Daniel Cockayne. 2017. “Citation Matters: Mobilizing the Politics of Citation Toward a Practice of ‘Conscientious Engagement.’” Gender, Place & Culture 24 (7): 954–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339022.
Muldoon, James, Mark Graham, and Callum Cant. 2024. Feeding the Machine: The Hidden Human Labor Powering A.I. Canongate Books.
Murph, Nicole Lucero. 2025. “Beyond Information Literacy: Exploring AI’s Impact on Labor in Academic Libraries.” Library Trends 73 (4): 609–27. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968498.
Nicholson, Karen P. 2016. “‘Taking Back’ Information Literacy: Time and the One-Shot in the Neoliberal University.” In Critical Library Pedagogy Handbook, edited by Nicole Pagowsky and Kelly McElroy. ACRL. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14721/29062.
Nicolaisen, Jeppe. 2007. “Citation Analysis.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 609–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120.
O’Brien, Matt. 2023. “Chatbots Sometimes Make Things Up. Is AI’s Hallucination Problem Fixable?” The Associated Press, August 1. https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-hallucination-chatbots-chatgpt-falsehoods-ac4672c5b06e6f91050aa46ee731bcf4.
Offert, Fabian, and Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal. 2024. “The Method of Critical AI Studies, A Propaedeutic.” Preprint, arXiv, December 10. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.18833.
OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 System Card. https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4-system-card.pdf.
O’Sullivan, James. 2025. “Gen AI and the Citation Problem.” Text, Culture, Algorithms Substack, February 28. https://jamescosullivan.substack.com/p/gen-ai-and-the-citation-problem.
Pagowsky, Nicole. 2021. “The Contested One-Shot: Deconstructing Power Structures to Imagine New Futures.” College & Research Libraries 82 (3): 300–9. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.3.300.
Perrigo, Billy. 2023. “OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic.” Time, January 18. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.
Pierce, Matthew. 2025. “Academic Librarians, Information Literacy, and ChatGPT: Sounding the Alarm on a New Type of Misinformation.” College & Research Libraries News 86 (2): 68–70. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.86.2.68.
Popowich, Sam. 2024a. “ChatGPT and the Commodification of Knowledge Work.” CAUT Journal. https://doi.org/10.63409/2024.37.
Popowich, Sam. 2024b. Solving Names: Worldliness and Metaphysics in Librarianship. Litwin Books.
Postle, Brad, and Jacqueline Fulvio. 2024. “GCBI-alyzer.” University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Psychology. Last updated September 17, 2025. https://psych.wisc.edu/gcbialyzer/.
Proctor, Jason. 2024. “B.C. Lawyer Reprimanded for Citing Fake Cases Invented by ChatGPT.” CBC News, February 26. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/lawyer-chatgpt-fake-precedent-1.7126393.
Reisner, Alex. 2023. “These 183,000 Books Are Fueling the Biggest Fight in Publishing and Tech.” The Atlantic, September 25. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/09/books3-database-generative-ai-training-copyright-infringement/675363.
Reisner, Alex. 2025. “The Unbelievable Scale of AI’s Pirated-Books Problem.” The Atlantic, March 20. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/03/libgen-meta-openai/682093/.
Scott, Inara. 2023. “Yes, We Are in a (ChatGPT) Crisis.” Inside Higher Ed, April 18. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2023/04/18/yes-we-are-chatgpt-crisis.
Shah, Chirag, and Emily M. Bender. 2022. “Situating Search.” In CHIIR ’22: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, edited by David Elsweiler, Udo Kruschwitz, and Bernd Ludwig. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505816.
Shah, Chirag, and Emily M. Bender. 2024. “Envisioning Information Access Systems: What Makes for Good Tools and a Healthy Web?” ACM Transactions on the Web 18 (3): Article 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3649468.
Shange, Savannah. 2022. “Citation as Ceremony: #SayHerName, #CiteBlackWomen, and the Practice of Reparative Enunciation.” Cultural Anthropology 37 (2): 191–98. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca37.2.03.
Simpson, Colin. 2023. “ChatGPT - When Good Citations Go Bad.” Screenface (blog), February 24. https://www.screenface.net/chatgpt-when-good-citations-go-bad.
Slater, Avery. 2024. “Phantoms of Citation: AI and the Death of the Author-Function.” Poetics Today 45 (2): 223–31. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-11092818.
Slater, Kay. 2025. “Against AI: Critical Refusal in the Library.” Library Trends 73 (4): 588–608. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968497.
Small, Henry. 2016. “Referencing as Cooperation or Competition.” In Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication, edited by Cassidy R. Sugimoto. De Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464-006.
Smerdon, David (@dsmerdon). 2023. “Now we have the title of our fake paper: ‘A Theory of Economic History’. We need the most probable author.” Twitter (now X), January 26. https://x.com/dsmerdon/status/1618817753514938368.
Smith, Christen A., Erica L. Williams, Imani A. Wadud, and Whitney N. L. Pirtle, and The Cite Black Women Collective. 2021. “Cite Black Women: A Critical Praxis (A Statement).” Feminist Anthropology 2 (1): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12040.
Tay, Aaron. 2024. “Primo Research Assistant Launches - A First Look and Some Things You Should Know.” Aaron Tay’s Musings About Librarianship, September 15. https://musingsaboutlibrarianship.blogspot.com/2024/09/primo-research-assistant-launches-first.html.
Thomas, Jasmine. 2024. “Teaching Citation Justice.” WOC + Lib, September 25. https://www.wocandlib.org/features/2024/9/24/teaching-citation-justice.
Tucci, Ryan. 2023. “When Chat GPT Falters: Implications for Reference Services in Academic Libraries.” 8 Bit Librarian (blog), March 10. https://www.8bitlibrarian.com/when-chat-gpt-falters-implications-for-reference-services-in-academic-libraries/.
Turnitin. 2025. “AI Writing Detection in the New, Enhanced Similarity Report.” Turnitin Guides. August 27. https://guides.turnitin.com/hc/en-us/articles/22774058814093-AI-writing-detection-in-the-new-enhanced-Similarity-Report.
University of Chicago Press. 2023. “Citation, Documentation of Sources: FAQ 422.” The Chicago Manual of Style Online. 17th ed. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/qanda/data/faq/topics/Documentation/faq0422.html.
University of Chicago Press. 2025. “14.112: Citing AI-Generated Content.” The Chicago Manual of Style Online. 18th ed. https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/book/ed18/part3/ch14/psec112.html.
Van der Sar, Ernesto. 2024. “NVIDIA: Copyrighted Books Are Just Statistical Correlations to Our AI Models.” TorrentFreak, August 17. https://torrentfreak.com/nvidia-copyrighted-books-are-just-statistical-correlations-to-our-ai-models-240617/.
Vinsel, Lee. 2021. “You’re Doing It Wrong: Notes on Criticism and Technology Hype.” Medium, February 1. https://sts-news.medium.com/youre-doing-it-wrong-notes-on-criticism-and-technology-hype-18b08b4307e5.
Walters, William H., and Esther Isabelle Wilder. 2023. “Fabrication and Errors in the Bibliographic Citations Generated by ChatGPT.” Scientific Reports 13: 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5.
Warner, John. 2025. More Than Words: How to Think About Writing in the Age of AI. Basic Books.
Watson, Alex P. 2024. “Hallucinated Citation Analysis: Delving into Student-Submitted AI-Generated Sources at the University of Mississippi.” The Serials Librarian 85 (5–6): 172–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2024.2433640.
Watters, Audrey. 2020. “School Work and Surveillance.” Hack Education (blog), April 30. https://hackeducation.com/2020/04/30/surveillance.
Weber-Wulff, Debora, Alla Anohina-Naumeca, Sonja Bjelobaba, Tomáš Foltýnek, Jean Guerrero-Dib, Olumide Popoola, Petr Šigut, and Lorna Waddington. 2023. “Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 19: Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.
Weissman, Jeremy. 2023. “ChatGPT Is a Plague Upon Education.” Inside Higher Ed, February 8. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2023/02/09/chatgpt-plague-upon-education-opinion.
Welborn, Aaron. 2023. “ChatGPT and Fake Citations.” Duke University Libraries Blog, March 9. https://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2023/03/09/chatgpt-and-fake-citations/.
Whitten, Elizabeth. 2025. “N.L. Asks Deloitte to Carry Out Review After ‘Incorrect’ Citations Found in $1.6M Provincial Health Plan.” CBC News, November 24. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/nl-deloitte-citations-9.6990216.
Wolfram, Stephen. 2023. “What Is ChatGPT Doing . . . and Why Does It Work?” Writings (blog), February 14. https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2023/02/what-is-chatgpt-doing-and-why-does-it-work.
Wondracek, Jenny. 2025. “Coming Soon: The Interactive GenAI Legal Hallucination Tracker— Sneak Peek Today!” AI Law Librarians (blog), August 10. https://www.ailawlibrarians.com/2025/08/10/coming-soon-the-interactive-genai-legal-hallucination-tracker-sneak-peek-today/.
Wouters, Paul. 2016. “Semiotics and Citations.” In Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication, edited by Cassidy R. Sugimoto. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308464-007.
Young, Jeffrey R. 2023. “Georgia Tech Is Trying to Keep a ChatGPT-Powered Teaching Assistant From ‘Hallucinating.’” EdSurge, June 22. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2023-06-22-georgia-tech-is-trying-to-keep-a-chatgpt-powered-teaching-assistant-from-hallucinating.
Zhou, Dale, Jennifer Stiso, Max Bertolero, Eli Cornblath, Erin Teich, Ann Sizemore Blevins, Kieran Murphy, Kendra Oudyk, Cleanthis Michael, Anne Urai, Jordan Matelsky, Virtualmario, Christopher Camp, Raul Alacantra Castillo, Rebecca Saxe, Jordan Dworkin, and Dani Bassett. 2022. “dalejn/cleanBib.” Zenodo. Last modified December 13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3672109.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Joel Blechinger

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


