Modelling Open Social Scholarship Within the INKE Community

Authors

  • Alyssa Arbuckle University of Victoria
  • John Maxwell Simon Fraser University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.15

Keywords:

open access, open scholarship, scholarly communication, publishing

Abstract

Given the current state of digital technology, there is a clear opportunity to revamp scholarly communication into a multi-faceted, open system that integrates and takes advantage of the near-ubiquitous global network. In doing so, the values of collaboration, sharing, and transparency inherent to open social scholarship can be integrated into knowledge dissemination methods. The Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) community is currently organized around the idea of open social scholarship, but putting this into practice will involve assessing and revising INKE’s own scholarly communication processes. In this paper, we explore the current state of open access to academic research and ruminate on next steps, beyond open access. We consider the role of collaboration in contemporary academic practice, and the importance of transparency in regards to multiplayer work. Further, we examine the standard scholarly communication model, especially as it pertains to INKE. Finally, we make recommendations and suggest alternatives for transforming our stock scholarly communication models into open social scholarship practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alyssa Arbuckle, University of Victoria

Alyssa Arbuckle is the Associate Director of the Electronic Textual Cultures Lab (ETCL) at the University of Victoria, where she works with the Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) research group and the Digital Humanities Summer Institute (DHSI). Arbuckle is also an interdisciplinary PhD student at the University of Victoria, studying open social scholarship and its implementation (planned completion 2019). She holds a BA Honours in English from the University of British Columbia and an MA in English from the University of Victoria, and her previous studies have centred around digital humanities, new media, and contemporary American literature. Her work has appeared in Digital Studies, Digital Humanities Quarterly, and Scholarly and Research Communication, among other venues.

John Maxwell, Simon Fraser University

Dr. John Maxwell is Associate Professor and Director of the Publishing Program at SFU, where his research is on the impact of digital technologies on book and magazine publishing. His work has focused on practical publication technologies, the evolution of scholarly monographs, and the history of computing. John directs SFU's Digital Aldine Collection and is pretty keen on the 16th century. He is old enough to remember the Web when it was brand new.

References

Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. 2003. https://openaccess.mpg.de/67605/berlin_declaration_engl.pdf.

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. 2003. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm. Archived at: https://perma.cc/QBV8-4AN5.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. 2002. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Archived at: https://perma.cc/LR6G-ZNXV.

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2011. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: New York University Press.

Government of Canada, Social Sciences, and Humanities Research Council. 2015. Tri-Agency Open Access Policy on Publications. Ottawa: SSHRC. http://www.science.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=F6765465-1. Archived at: https://perma.cc/85RF-JRJ2.

Madalli, Devika P., Jaideep Sharma, and Sanjaya Mishra. 2015. “Concepts of Openness and Open Access.” In: Open Access for Researchers. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Maxwell, John W. 2015. “Beyond Open Access to Open Publication and Open Scholarship.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(3): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n3a202

McGregor, Heidi, and Kevin Guthrie. 2015. “Delivering Impact of Scholarly Information: Is Access Enough?” Journal of Electronic Publishing, 18(3): 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0018.302

Siemens, Lynne. 2012a. “Firing on All Cylinders: Progress and Transition in INKE’s Year 2.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 3(4): 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2012v3n4a72

Siemens, Lynne. 2012b. “Understanding Long-Term Collaboration: Reflections on Year 1 and Before.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 3(1): 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2012v3n1a48

Siemens, Lynne. 2013. “Responding to Change and Transition in INKE’s Year 3.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 4(3): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2013v4n3a115

Siemens, Lynne. 2014. “Research Collaboration as ‘Layers of Engagement’: INKE in Year Four.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 5(4): 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n4a181

Siemens, Lynne. 2015. “‘INKE-cubating’ Research Networks, Projects, and Partnerships: Reflections on INKE’s Fifth Year.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(4): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n4a198

Siemens, Lynne. 2016. “‘Faster Alone, Further Together’: Reflections on INKE’s Year Six.” Scholarly and Research Communication, 7(2): 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2016v7n2/3a250

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. n.d. “UNESCO’s Open Access (OA) Curriculum Is Now Online.” http://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-s-open-access-oa-curriculum-now-online.

U.S. Department of Education. 2016. “U.S. Department of Education Plan and Policy Development Guidance for Public Access: Improving Access to Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research.” Retrieved from: The Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/funding/researchaccess.asp.

Wellcome Trust. 2012. “Wellcome Trust Policy on Open Access.” https://wellcome.ac.uk/funding/managing-grant/open-access-policy. Archived at: https://perma.cc/6X4J-VRUQ.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-27

How to Cite

Arbuckle, Alyssa, and John Maxwell. 2019. “Modelling Open Social Scholarship Within the INKE Community”. KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 3 (1):2. https://doi.org/10.5334/kula.15.

Issue

Section

Methods Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)